Watch Demo×
×

See NinjaOne in action!

By submitting this form, I accept NinjaOne's privacy policy.

Baramundi vs Naverisk

Get help choosing. Watch a free demo
NinjaOne

Ratings

Baramundi

Naverisk

NinjaOne Logo®

Overall

5
4.7

4.8

Meets Requirements

9.4
41 responses

9.2

905 responses

Ease of Use

9.1
42 responses

9.3

912 responses

Ease of Setup

9
34 responses

9.4

804 responses

Ease of Admin

9.2
34 responses

9.5

80 responses

Quality of Support

9.6
41 responses

9.4

876 responses

Ease of Doing Business with

9.5
34 responses

9.6

808 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

9.3
35 responses

9.8

897 responses

Based on G2 Spring 2024

Competitors

Baramundi

Product Summary

Baramundi is a unified endpoint management software provider that allows IT teams to manage their endpoints from anywhere with an internet connection. Its solution features Windows management and patch management for Microsoft and other third-party applications.

Use Cases

  • Automated software deployment:
    Baramundi allows you to deploy software faster and at scale.
  • Compliance scans:
    Baramundi software regularly runs compliance scans to ensure that all your software and applications are up-to-date.
  • Asset inventory:
    Baramundi keeps an accurate, real-time inventory of all your managed hardware and software.

Shortcomings

  • Scripting:
    Baramundi could add to its script library or its ability to create custom scripts.
  • Support for macOS devices:
    Baramundi is limited in macOS support, especially in patch management and remote access.
  • Static dashboards:
    Baramundi’s dashboard is not as intuitive as expected.

Naverisk

Product Summary

Naverisk is an IT services platform that consolidates remote monitoring and management (RMM), professional services automation (PSA), and service desk tools into one solution. With Naverisk, technicians can easily manage and monitor the entire IT environment. Tools such as patch management, alerts, and automation ensure that endpoints remain up-to-date, and efficient.

Use Cases

  • Remote monitoring:
    Naverisk monitors devices and servers in real time, allowing technicians to diagnose and remediate problems early.
  • Endpoint management:
    Naverisk allows users to manage devices from a single console, keeping them updated and secure. With integrations, technicians can access remote devices.
  • Automation:
    Technicians can code policies to automate routine IT tasks and workflows with open-source scripting.

Shortcomings

  • Search feature issues:
    Users have reported that the search function does not work well, making navigating the platform difficult.
  • Outdated interface:
    Naverisk’s GUI has been described as lacking. Others are asking for more GUI customization to address this.
  • Support for non-Windows OS is lacking:
    Mac and Linux devices do not function well with this solution.

NinjaOne

Why your peers choose us over Baramundi and Naverisk

NinjaOne sets itself apart with its exceptional customer reviews, usability and comprehensive integration options, positioning it ahead of its competitors. The platform’s interface is expertly crafted for both quick adoption and ease of use, vital for dynamic IT environments. This focus on user experience doesn’t compromise its robust feature set, which is designed to boost operational efficiency, an area where many competitors struggle.

In terms of integration, NinjaOne shines by offering extensive compatibility with a wide array of third-party applications, an area where other RMM solutions often have limitations. This makes it a more adaptable choice for varied IT ecosystems. Furthermore, NinjaOne’s scalability and performance consistency, even in large network scenarios, mark it as a superior option. Enhanced by advanced, customizable reporting tools, NinjaOne emerges as a leading choice for IT professionals seeking a dependable, efficientRMM platform.

What they're saying

G2 5-star rating
Software Advice 5-star rating

Watch a Demo of the #1 IT Management Software on G2

Related resources