/
/

The Differences between CVE and CVSS Scores: Definition & Importance

by Lauren Ballejos, IT Editorial Expert
Differences between CVE and CVSS scores blog banner

Key Points

  • CVE vs. CVSS: CVE identifies vulnerabilities; CVSS scores their severity from 0 to 10.
  • Primary Use: Together, they help IT teams assess risk and prioritize patching efforts.
  • CVE Info: Provides descriptions, dates, and sometimes solutions for known vulnerabilities.
  • CVSS Strength: Quantifies severity to guide remediation order.
  • Limitations: CVSS lacks context and updates; CVE may omit fixes and focus only on unpatched software.
  • Why It Matters: Despite flaws, CVE and CVSS are essential tools for informed, effective vulnerability management.

As we move into the new year, organizations can expect the number of cyberattacks to increase significantly. To battle these upcoming threats, effective patching and patch management processes will be essential. Before patching vulnerabilities, there are two main vulnerability assessments that IT teams should focus on: CVE & CVSS scores. Below, we’ll examine the importance of CVE & CVSS scores along with some of their uses and benefits in the cybersecurity space.

CVE vs CVSS scores, explained

What is CVE score

CVE stands for Common Vulnerabilities or Exposers, and it’s a public list of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. This glossary organizes these security weaknesses with identification numbers, dates, and descriptions.

Well-known examples of vulnerabilities listed in the CVE include CVE-2017-0144 (known as EternalBlue) and CVE-2014-0160 (Heartbleed bug of 2014).

What is CVSS

CVSS stands for Common Vulnerability Scoring System, and it’s a numerical score that rates the severity of vulnerabilities on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. It’s often used to rate the severity of the publicly disclosed vulnerabilities listed in the CVE.

Here’s a table showing the CVSS score ranges, arranged by severity of the vulnerability.

CVSS Score RangeSeverity LevelDescription
0.0NoneNo impact; not a vulnerability
0.1 – 3.9LowMinimal impact; low risk to systems
4.0 – 6.9MediumModerate risk; should be addressed, but not urgent
7.0 – 8.9HighSerious risk; requires prompt remediation
9.0 – 10.0CriticalSevere risk; immediate action required

To know how these scores are calculated, you can read more in FIRST (Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams)’s explanation here.

Differences between CVE and CVSS scores

CVE and CVSS ratings both assess vulnerabilities. According to the National Vulnerability Database, a vulnerability is “A weakness in the computational logic (e.g., code) found in software and hardware components that, when exploited, results in a negative impact to confidentiality, integrity, or availability.” Before patching a vulnerability, organizations use CVE & CVSS scores to gather more information about the vulnerability and its severity.

CVE vs CVSS: Key Differences
FeatureCVECVSS
PurposeIdentifies vulnerabilitiesScores severity
FormatID (e.g., CVE-2024-1234)Score (0–10)
Managed byMITRE / NVDFIRST
OutputDescription + metadataNumerical rating
Use caseAwarenessPrioritization

Where to find CVE and CVSS scores

Currently, MITRE manages the CVE database and works closely with the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), which is a part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). To find CVSS scores, businesses rely on FIRST, a US non-profit organization.

Uses for CVE and CVSS scores

Today, IT teams rely on CVE & CVSS scores to learn more about security weaknesses before creating strategies to solve them. Some common uses for CVE & CVSS scores include:

  • Quantifying the severity of vulnerabilities

CVSS scores quantify the severity of vulnerabilities. An IT team can use this information to determine which vulnerabilities pose the most serious threats and resolve them first before moving on to more minor weaknesses.

For example, a vulnerability with a CVSS score of 8 is more of a threat than a vulnerability with a score of 3. In this case, an IT team can resolve the vulnerability scored 8 first before resolving the less serious vulnerability scored 3.

  • Understanding more about each vulnerability

The CVE provides descriptions, dates, and other information about vulnerabilities. Additionally, the CVE sometimes lists the fixes or solutions for a specific vulnerability. This valuable information allows an IT team to learn more about a vulnerability so that they can come up with a solution.

  • Supporting patch management efforts

CVE & CVSS scores provide guidance for an IT team and additional support for patch management efforts. These assessments help an IT team to plan, prepare, and resolve vulnerabilities before they become serious issues for an organization.

Have questions about patching? Check out the NinjaOne Patch Management FAQ for detailed answers.

Prioritize and patch the most urgent vulnerabilities with NinjaOne’s automated patching software.

Try NinjaOne Patch Management for free or watch a demo.

The importance of CVE and CVSS scores

Even though CVE & CVSS scores aren’t perfect, they are currently some of the best assessments to use for vulnerabilities. They allow IT teams to categorize, prioritize, and create order when dealing with pesky vulnerabilities. Additionally, IT teams can rely on both CVE & CVSS scores together to gain more insight into security weaknesses while creating a plan to resolve them.

Limitations of CVE & CVSS scores

Although some organizations claim that CVE & CVSS scores are overused and overvalued in the cybersecurity space, they are currently the best assessments available for vulnerabilities. With that being said, they do have certain limitations as shown below:

CVSS score limitations

  • Inaccurately measures risk

Unfortunately, the CVSS scores given to vulnerabilities don’t always measure risk accurately. For example, vulnerabilities scored 7.0 and above are considered the most serious threats that should be handled before others. However, are threats scored 6.5 any less dangerous than threats scored 7.0? Sometimes, the 6.5 vulnerability ends up causing more issues than a 7.0 vulnerability.

  • Remains unchanged and unupdated

After a CVSS score is assigned to a vulnerability, it is usually never changed or updated. This static score doesn’t take any changes or new information into account.

  • Omits necessary context

Since a CVSS score is simply a number, it does not provide any context or additional information about a vulnerability. Because of this, it’s difficult to determine how a vulnerability will actually affect a security system.

CVE score limitations

  • Lacks critical information

Although the CVE does provide some information about a vulnerability, it does not provide enough for an IT security team to use to fix the issue. Kenna Security explains this issue, stating, “CVE records, for instance, generally lack key information such as exploit codes, fixes, popular targets, known malware, remote code execution details, etc. To find those, security personnel have to do some additional sleuthing. (CVE records do often link to vendor sites and other resources, and these may in turn include links to patches and remediation advice. But it’s a manual, hunt-and-peck process that can be overwhelming to security teams facing a list of hundreds, even thousands of so-called critical vulnerabilities.)

  • Ignores threats for patched software

The CVE only focuses on vulnerabilities in unpatched software, ignoring the risks or threats that target patched software. Just because software is patched does not mean that it’s completely safe from vulnerabilities and threats.

  • Does not always provide a fix

Although it’s a common belief that the CVE offers fixes for vulnerabilities, that’s not always the case. The CVE sometimes provides solutions or fixes for vulnerabilities, but not 100% of the time.

Secure your devices and keep them up-to-date with NinjaOne.

Explore NinjaOne Patch Management features.

Strengthen your IT security with NinjaOne

Patching and dealing with vulnerabilities is no easy task. That’s why NinjaOne offers a patch management solution that automates patching processes from a single pane of glass. With NinjaOne, you can minimize costs, reduce complexity, save time, and remediate vulnerabilities quickly. Get in touch with NinjaOne today to learn more and start your free trial.

FAQs

CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifies and catalogs known security vulnerabilities, while CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) assigns a numerical score (0–10) to measure their severity.

A CVSS score indicates how severe a vulnerability is, helping IT teams prioritize which issues to fix first. Higher scores (e.g., 8–10) represent more critical risks.

CVE provides detailed information about a vulnerability, while CVSS quantifies its severity. Together, they help organizations assess risk and prioritize patching efforts effectively.

CVE entries are managed by MITRE and available through the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), while CVSS scores are maintained by FIRST and often included alongside CVE listings.

They help IT teams identify vulnerabilities, understand their impact, and prioritize remediation—making patch management more efficient and reducing security risks.

CVSS scores can lack real-world context and may not update over time, while CVE entries may miss critical details like fixes or exploit data. Both should be used alongside other security insights.

You might also like

Ready to simplify the hardest parts of IT?