Key Points
- Identify which framework (e.g., NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO 27001, SOC 2) aligns with the client’s size, industry, and compliance requirements before implementation.
- Explain security frameworks in plain language, focusing on risk reduction, compliance readiness, and business resilience rather than technical controls.
- Map current tools and processes to framework controls to highlight existing alignment, reduce effort, and establish realistic next steps.
- Apply a low-pressure, step-by-step approach (awareness → partial alignment → improvement planning) to prevent client overwhelm.
- Leverage maturity scores, diagrams, and reports to make framework alignment measurable, actionable, and easy to understand.
Security frameworks can be intimidating for clients, especially those unfamiliar with technology. From ISO 27001 to NIST CSF to SOC 2, frameworks seem too resource-intensive or complex. Especially for organizations just starting to formalize their security posture.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) can play a crucial role by helping clients explore frameworks without forcing them to commit. This approach helps clients identify where their current practices already align with established frameworks.
Meet security framework requirements quickly with NinjaOne.
Helping clients navigate security frameworks with no commitment
MSPs can help their clients navigate security frameworks without commitment. This can be done by explaining them simply or identifying overlap with current practices. You can also build a roadmap, use visual cues, and position frameworks as strategic guides.
📌 Prerequisites:
- Awareness of leading frameworks.
- Clear understanding of SMB client industries and regulatory drivers.
- Baseline security posture assessment tools.
- A Quarterly Business Review (QBR) or roadmap process to introduce framework alignment gradually.
Step 1: Explain frameworks in plain business terms
This step breaks frameworks into business terms. This enables MSPs to help clients understand what they’re about and why they matter in relation to business goals.
📌 Use Case: A potential client might ask a mid-sized SaaS provider whether they are “SOC 2 compliant.” Without context, leadership may not understand how SOC 2 differs from ISO 27001 or NIST CSF. This confusion can delay decisions and even lead to lost business.
Break the frameworks into categories that map to client priorities. Use plain language so anyone can understand where the framework fits:
NIST CSF (Cybersecurity Framework)
This framework is a flexible, maturity-based roadmap that helps organizations strengthen their security posture. It’s great for showing progress and aligning cybersecurity investment with business risk.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 is a governance-driven framework emphasizing policies, processes, and management oversight. It is certification-focused. This means it demonstrates to regulators, partners, and clients that security is properly managed. This category makes the framework ideal for businesses looking for international recognition and structured compliance.
SOC 2
This framework demonstrates that service providers effectively safeguard data, thereby fostering trust and assurance among clients and stakeholders. It’s ideal for Software as a Service (SaaS) providers and IT service companies selling to enterprises.
CIS Controls
CIS controls are a prioritized checklist of security practices for immediate and practical protection. It’s ideal for achieving quick wins and implementing practical security improvements, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses.
⚠️ Warning: Break frameworks into plain-language categories to avoid confusion. (For more info, refer to: Things to look out for)
Step 2: Identify overlap with current practices
This step identifies and highlights overlaps to help MSPs reassure clients they are progressing towards compliance.
📌 Use Case: A client preparing for an SOC 2 audit may be anxious about the effort required. However, when you show them that their existing endpoint monitoring already supports SOC 2’s “Security” principle. Or, that their patch compliance aligns directly with NIST’s “Protect” function, their confidence increases.
Demonstrate alignment between current MSP services and the controls outlined in the framework to help clients see that:
- They’re building towards compliance.
- MSP services provide value, such as operational support and regulatory alignment.
- Gaps are easier to spot once the overlap is evident.
For example:
- Patch compliance → NIST “Protect” and CIS Control 7
- Backup and restore validation → ISO 27001 Annex A.12, NIST “Recover”
- Endpoint monitoring → SOC 2 “Security” principle
Step 3: Build a “no commitment” roadmap
This step helps lower resistance to framework adoption by framing it as a journey.
📌 Use Case: A growing SaaS company may want to pursue SOC 2 to win enterprise clients, but leadership hesitates due to cost and effort. Instead of pushing for full adoption immediately, the MSP can introduce framework concepts gradually.
Break framework adoption into three phases to make progress visible and achievable:
Phase 1: Awareness
Introduce framework categories and map them to business priorities during QBRs. For example, explain SOC 2’s “Security” principle as protecting client trust.
Phase 2: Light Alignment
Highlight three to five controls that the client already meets through MSP services. For example, tell them their patch management already supports CIS Control 7.
Phase 3: Next Steps
Propose achievable improvements to continue alignment. Recommend MFA rollout, endpoint hardening, or backup validation.
⚠️ Warning: Introduce phased adoption to prevent clients from viewing frameworks as overwhelming projects. (For more info, refer to: Things to look out for)
Step 4: Use visual cues to simplify communication
This step translates framework progress into visual cues, making complex security posture discussions accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
📌 Use Case: A client working toward ISO 27001 certification may struggle to understand their position. This is beneficial for condensing dense documentation. For instance, MSPs can show a heat map with green, yellow, and red cells for each compliance category.
Replace text blocks in reports with visuals that show progress and gaps at a glance:
- Heat Maps: Use color codes to show how aligned the client is in each framework category.
- Radar Chart: Plot framework domains against client readiness to show balance across areas.
- Progress Bars: Track framework alignment percentage or completed milestones over time to highlight progress.
Step 5: Position frameworks as strategic guides
This method reframes frameworks as strategic guides for ongoing risk reduction, allowing MSPs to show that partial adoption still delivers business value.
📌 Use Case: A mid-market manufacturing firm may balk at pursuing full ISO 27001 certification. This is assuming it requires years of effort and large budgets. Aside from being a compliance mandate, applying selected ISO principles can significantly reduce risk.
Shift the conversation from compliance-driven checklists to business-driven guidance:
- Avoid “All-or-Nothing” Messaging: Clients don’t need to view every control for them to see the benefits.
- Frame Risk Reduction Tools: Show how frameworks guide smarter security investments.
- Emphasize Principles Over Certification: Adopting best practices provides significant benefits even without formal certification.
- Reassure Clients: Frameworks are flexible roadmaps, and businesses can grow into them over time.
⚠️ Warning: Avoid framing frameworks as mandates to prevent clients from thinking certification is the only goal. (For more info, refer to: Things to look out for)
Best practices to help clients navigate security frameworks
The table below summarizes the best practices to follow when assisting clients in navigating security frameworks:
| Practice | Value delivered |
| Simplify frameworks into business terms | Improves client comprehension |
| Map MSP services to frameworks | Shows hidden value already being delivered |
| Phase alignment in gradually | Reduces overwhelm and cost anxiety |
| Use visuals for maturity scoring | Makes abstract concepts tangible |
| Position frameworks as guides | Builds trust and a long-term planning mindset |
⚠️ Things to look out for when helping clients with security frameworks
The following are possible risks, consequences, and ways to reverse them when assisting clients to navigate security frameworks:
| Risks | Potential Consequences | Reversals |
| A client sees frameworks as abstract. | Confusion can delay decisions, cause clients to lose confidence, or result in missed opportunities. | Break frameworks into plain-language categories. |
| A client views frameworks as overwhelming projects. | Resistance to adoption, stalled progress, or abandonment of framework goals. | Introduce phased adoption to build momentum. |
| A client thinks certification is the only goal. | Fear of cost and time may lead to refusal and missed security improvements. | Reframe frameworks as ongoing guides for risk reduction, rather than mandates. |
NinjaOne services that MSPs assist clients in navigating security frameworks
MSPs can leverage NinjaOne by:
Exporting compliance and patching data
NinjaOne supports vulnerability data import and export through its Vulnerability Importer. This feature can import CSV files from different security tools. Plus, provide detailed reporting with CVE information, risk scores, and device mapping.
Scheduling recurring reports
NinjaOne’s scheduled reports feature allows MSPs to set up reports daily, weekly, or monthly. The feature can also automatically distribute reports.
Endpoint health and framework-aligned controls
This feature provides comprehensive endpoint health monitoring. The dashboard shows:
- Vulnerability status
- Risk levels
- Device health indicators
- CVE details and remediation suggestions
Help clients understand what it takes to comply with security frameworks.
Reduce client anxiety by helping them navigate the security framework
Helping clients navigate security frameworks enables MSPs to build confidence and show value without overwhelming stakeholders. Simplifying frameworks, mapping them to existing services, and visualizing progress are crucial for MSPs. They help to guide clients toward better security at their own pace.
Related topics:
