Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Slack are among the most widely used platforms for business communication and productivity, and organizations are increasingly more dependent on SaaS platforms.
Because of this, analyzing SaaS logs and ensuring that all your data is properly backed up is essential. Documenting backup coverage gaps prevents critical oversights, translates risk into compliance and financial terms, and provides evidence-based recommendations during onboarding, QBRs, or renewal reviews.
A guide for addressing SaaS backup coverage gaps
To address backup coverage gaps for your clients, you should first inventory all your SaaS tools and how they’re used in existing workflows. After that, review your native retention tools and figure out where the gaps are.
Then, you can audit your current backup tool coverage, document the risks in business language, and recommend remediation actions. This will give your clients a clear idea of what’s going on and what they’re supposed to do.
📌 Prerequisites:
- You will need admin access to Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, or Slack environments, depending on which SaaS tools your organization uses.
- You will need access to existing SaaS backup or retention policies to review them.
- Knowledge of compliance standards relevant to clients (HIPAA, SOX, GDPR, CCPA) is required.
- You should have a reporting/documentation platform (Excel, Power BI, or NinjaOne Docs).
Step 1: Inventory SaaS workloads by platform
Many organizations use multiple SaaS platforms for their workflows. Depending on your situation, you may need to make an inventory of the following:
- Microsoft 365: Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams.
- Google Workspace: Gmail, Drive, Shared Drives, Calendar, Contacts.
- Slack: Direct messages, channels, shared files.
The expected deliverable for this step is a CSV inventory file containing all the platforms your organization uses for workflows.
Step 2: Review native retention vs. true backup
Identify the purpose of each SaaS backup platform. What native services do they protect (Recycle Bin, version history, retention policies)?
Once you’ve noted everything down, you can highlight the gaps. Are there short retention windows? Is there a problem with point-time restoration? Is there a lack of coverage for your internal DMs? Each organization must ask different questions that apply to its situation.
The expected deliverable for this step is a comparison chart of native protections and the SaaS tools they need to cover and backup gaps.
Step 3: Audit current backup tool coverage
You need to confirm which services are being actively backed up by third-party tools. Check your Google Shared Drive, Microsoft Teams chats, and Slack conversations? Are all your organization’s data backed up according to your organization’s policies? Are there any gaps that need to be covered?
You should also review your organization’s retention policies and backup frequency, and compare them to existing workflows. Are there points for improvement and areas where your backup coverage is lacking?
The expected deliverable is a gap analysis matrix. The document should map covered vs uncovered workloads.
Step 4: Document risks in business language
Not everyone understands technical language. Because of this, you need to translate the uncovered areas and explain why they should be covered in language that all stakeholders will understand.
For example, you can say:
- If Teams chats are not backed up → Project communications made through Teams may be lost.
- If Slack DMs are excluded from backups → Slack DMs not being backed up can be a compliance blind spot for audits.
- If the Google Shared Drives are not covered → There’s risk of permanent data loss from accidental deletion if your organization’s Google Shared Drives are not covered.
You should also create a risk impact scale to help clients quickly and easily understand the severity of coverage gaps.
- Low – Data that is useful to operations but will not affect workflows if lost.
- Medium – Data that is valuable and may slow down workflows if lost, but not critical to actually keeping your operations running.
- High – Data that is necessary to keep your operations running.
The expected deliverable for this step is a client-facing risk summary report written using business language they can easily understand.
Step 5: Recommend remediation actions
Once you’ve outlined problems with backup coverage, your next step should be to recommend remediation actions. Outline what your client’s options are. Some suggestions you can give are:
- Third-party backups
- Retention policy adjustments
- Compliance hold implementation
When backing up data, consider if the data is:
- Critical
- Valuable, or
- Useful
Data that is critical to your business operations should be backed up frequently, with very valuable but not critical data being next in line in terms of priority. And data that is useful but not necessarily important should be backed up periodically.
Once you’ve agreed on everything, the remediation can be implemented. These discussions should be integrated during client onboarding and your quarterly planning.
The expected deliverable for this step is a document containing a roadmap tied to QBRs and renewal cycles.
Summary of best practices for addressing SaaS coverage gaps
| Component | Purpose and value |
| SaaS workload inventory | This ensures that no services are overlooked. Having a complete inventory of all SaaS applications will make it easier to spot any backup gaps that need to be addressed. |
| Retention vs. backup review | This exposes gaps where native protections fall short. It will also show whether third-party services are needed to ensure that all organization data is properly backed up. |
| Gap analysis matrix | This clarifies what data is covered and uncovered. It will give your client more concrete examples and show the immediate need for backup coverage. |
| Business risk translation | This makes your findings more meaningful for executives. It explains the issue in language that is easy for them to understand and relate to. |
| Remediation roadmap | This gives your client actionable steps. It will provide them with concrete examples of what needs to be done to ensure all backup coverage gaps are filled and regulatory requirements are met. |
NinjaOne integration ideas for addressing backup gaps
NinjaOne can assist in covering SaaS backup gaps by:
- Hosting documentation for SaaS backup gaps in NinjaOne Docs
- Automating reminders for quarterly backup validation reviews
- Tracking remediation tasks via ticket workflows
- Including gap findings in QBR dashboards
- Linking backup gap evidence into renewal or compliance discussions
Quick-Start Guide
Here are some key points:
1. Understanding Backup vs. Sync: One article discusses the difference between OneDrive sync and actual backups, emphasizing that sync is not a substitute for proper backup solutions.
2. Detecting Missing Backups: Another article covers how to identify missing backups without relying on a full backup platform, which could be useful for documenting coverage gaps.
3. Optimizing Backup Chains: A third article addresses how to optimize backup chains, which may help in ensuring comprehensive coverage across SaaS applications.
To document backup coverage gaps across core SaaS apps with NinjaOne, consider the following approach:
– Inventory Your SaaS Applications: Make a comprehensive list of all SaaS applications in use across your organization.
– Map Backup Coverage: For each application, document what data is being backed up (e.g., emails, files, databases) and verify that backups are running successfully.
– Identify Gaps: Look for applications or data types that are not being backed up or where backup coverage is incomplete.
– Implement Monitoring: Set up monitoring to ensure ongoing backup success and quickly identify any new gaps.
– Regular Audits: Conduct periodic audits to verify that your backup documentation remains accurate and up-to-date.
Safeguard your data by documenting backup coverage gaps
Documenting SaaS backup coverage gaps ensures you can proactively identify risks, prevent data loss, and align with your client’s expectations. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) can demonstrate value and improve client trust by comparing native protections, auditing third-party tools, and presenting findings in client-friendly terms.
Related Links:
