What is BS IM and how does it compare to Sam in the every evolving landscape of software security? Choosing the right framework can make all the difference when evaluating your software security practices. It's important to consider the different focuses and methodologies each model brings. This guide explores the B-S-I-M-M framework and how it contrasts with SAMM. But before we begin, be sure to subscribe to Ninja One's IT Video Hub for more tech content like this. What is BSIM? M-B-S-I-M-M or the building? Security in maturity model helps organizations improve software security by showing what others are doing in practice. It's based on empirical data, not a fixed set of rules. So you can compare your practices to industry standards and find ways to improve based on your own needs. What is Sam? Sam or the software Assurance Maturity model helps organizations build strong software security by offering a flexible structured approach across five key areas, governance, construction, verification, deployment, and operations. It guides teams in making security a core part of every development stage, aiming to create a lasting culture of security instead of just addressing issues as they appear. B-S-I-M-M versus sam, when comparing bs, IM and Sam, it's key to understand that each offer a different approach to software security tailored to different organizational goals and maturity levels. Maturity level structures. BCMM is a descriptive model that shows what organizations are actually doing and lets you compare your security practices to real world data without telling you exactly what to do. In contrast, SAM is a prescriptive model with clear steps and milestones, assessment methods and availability. B-S-I-M-M uses real world data to help organizations benchmark their security maturity. While SAM provides a structured step-by-step framework for improving security based on risk. Both are publicly available. SAM is open source, while BSM requires participation in its community, implementing B-S-I-M-M and SAMM when choosing between B-S-I-M-M and SAMM consider your company's structure and culture as these affect how well each model can be tailored to your needs. B-S-I-M-M works best when you first assess your current security practices and define clear goals, involve key stakeholders and plan for regular updates. Sam, on the other hand, requires stakeholder engagement and continuous training programs. To build long-term security awareness and improvement, consider your current security maturity. B-S-I-M-M suits organizations with existing practices to refine while CMM is better for building a structured security framework from the ground up. For more information, check out our official blog post on B-S-I-M-M and SAMM linked in the description below.
CJ Ledesma Choosing the right software security framework can be the difference between staying protected and falling behind. But with so many options, where do you start? In this video, we break down BSIMM (Building Security In Maturity Model) and SAMM (Software Assurance Maturity Model), highlighting their key differences, benefits, and how to implement them based on your organization’s needs and maturity level.
Read the full blog on What Is BSIMM & How Does It Compare to SAMM
Snapshot Report Citation: IDC Business Value Snapshot sponsored by NinjaOne, The Business Value of NinjaOne for IT Operations, Doc #US54520326-BVS, May 2026.
GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally and is used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Magic Quadrant is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is used herein with permission. All rights reserved.
Gartner does not endorse any company, vendor, product or service depicted in its publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s business and technology insights organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this publication, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
This comparison represents our assessment of publicly available product capabilities as of January 2025. Our evaluation draws on vendor-provided materials, including product documentation and release notes, as well as publicly available pricing information, customer feedback, and analyst insights. Where applicable, details were reviewed against the vendor’s then-current generally available (GA) release as of the date indicated.
Enterprise IT leaders evaluating endpoint management platforms don’t just compare features: they also assess the time it takes to deliver value, the number of people needed to operate the system, and the actual cost after deployment, training, and ongoing operation.
NinjaOne delivers measurable results. On average, deployment is completed in less than 30 days; operators become proficient in less than 10 days. There is no infrastructure to provision, no phased rollout, and no deployment project scope to define: cloud-native SaaS means your team becomes productive in days, not months.
Your team configures, operates, and scales the system without dedicated administrators, proprietary query languages, or ongoing vendor support. And all of this on a unified platform, with no mandatory professional services, no premium support tiers, no hidden renewal costs, and rich features that don’t compromise the digital employee experience your organization is striving for.
