NinjaOne vs. Automox

Why your peers choose NinjaOne over Automox

NinjaOne

VS

NinjaOne vs. Automox Reviews

Automox
Overall4.7

(2,618)
4.4

(271)
Meets Requirements9.1
2,255 Responses
8.7
110 Responses
Ease of Use9.2
2,284 Responses
9.0
112 Responses
Ease of Setup9.2
2,123 Responses
9.2
106 Responses
Ease of Admin9.2
2,061 Responses
9.0
107 Responses
Quality of Support9.2
2,181 Responses
8.8
100 Responses
Ease of Doing Business With9.5
2,023 Responses
9.2
102 Responses
Product Direction (% positive)9.8
2,251 Responses
9.2
110 Responses

Based on G2 Summer 2025

Automox

Product Summary

Automox patch management leverages automation for repetitive actions and complex processes so your IT teams can spend more time on more strategic projects. Its platform centralizes your third-party patch management, configuring and updating over 500 third-party software titles from a single dashboard.

Use Cases

  • Automated patch management: Automox Patch Management leverages automation to update third-party business applications much faster and with more convenience. Because almost every task is automated, your IT team can now focus on more strategic projects without worry.
  • Streamlined management of third-party software: Automox provides a unified patching solution for Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Centralized management: Automox Patch Management allows you to view and monitor your entire IT network in a single pane of glass. This 360-degree visibility allows you to easily see and track the health and performance of each endpoint.

Shortcomings

  • Speed: The Automox platform can slow down when managing multiple devices. This can be limiting for businesses intending to scale in the coming years.
  • Reporting function: Reports made after patching could be improved. According to some G2 reviews, Automox doesn’t provide comprehensive reports on endpoints before and after patching.
  • User-friendliness: G2 users have expressed interest in enhancing the user interface. The Automox patching interface may be better suited for more experienced IT professionals.

NinjaOne

Why your peers choose us over Automox

While Automox patch management is a robust solution that updates multiple operating systems and third-party business applications, it is not without its limitations. Arguably, the main reason users choose NinjaOne over Automox for their patch management is its reliability and simplicity.

NinjaOne patch management is consistently rated #1 for its ease-of-use and proven track record for maintaining its speed even as you scale. This means that you never have to worry about NinjaOne slowing down when patching multiple endpoints. In fact, 90% of NinjaOne customers report saving time in their patching processes.

NinjaOne also offers flexible patching schedules to ensure all endpoints are patched. The best part: Its platform is designed to be as intuitive as possible, so almost anyone can use it, regardless of technical knowledge or experience.

“Before NinjaOne, we had many tools ranging from PDQ for software deployment to Automox for third-party patching to WSUS for Microsoft updates. Having that many tools stacked atop each other left gaps in our security. In switching to NinjaOne, we eliminated the need for those other tools and enhanced our overall security posture thanks to NinjaOne’s single pane environment.”

Nick Lenius // VP of IT at Great Plains Bank

This is why customers love us

NinjaOne Integrations

Splashtop logo Splashtop
Azure logo Azure
SentinelOne logo SentinelOne
Slack logo Slack
CrowdStrike logo CrowdStrike
Okta logo Okta
ConnectWise logo ConnectWise
N-able logo N-able Passportal
OneLogin logo OneLogin
ITGlue logo IT Glue
  • Splashtop integration logo

    Splashtop

  • Azure integration logo

    Azure

  • SentinelOne integration logo

    SentinelOne

  • Slack integration logo

    Slack

  • CrowdStrike integration logo

    CrowdStrike

  • Okta integration logo

    Okta

  • ConnectWise integration logo

    ConnectWise

  • N-Able integration logo

    N-Able

  • One Login logo

    One Login

  • IT Glue logo

    IT Glue

NinjaOne vs. Automox FAQs

Both platforms offer centralized management and automated patching of Windows, macOS, and Linux OSs and multiple third-party apps. However, NinjaOne ranks higher than Automox patch management on G2 for ease of use, reliability, and reporting. NinjaOne automated endpoint management is an all-in-one solution that helps IT teams deliver better patch compliance faster, without needing VPN.
Automox patch management provides admin-initiated system reboots in its worklets. Its Targeted Reboot conditionally forces a reboot on a system within a scheduled timeframe, allowing IT teams to improve network security and mitigate the risk of malware.
Yes, it does; however, NinjaOne remains the top Automox patch management alternative for its straightforward interface and remote control tools. NinjaOne integrates with leading apps, such as TeamViewer and Splashtop, to provide effortless yet still reliable remote access capabilities.

Yes, the Automox agent performs a wide variety of tasks, including software and patch deployment and monitoring of endpoint performance. Automox users are highly encouraged to modify and configure their worklets further to ensure regular evaluations.

That said, many G2 users have expressed concerns over Automox’s reporting feature in detailing endpoint health and performance. According to reviews, Automox reporting could be further improved so it’s much more comprehensive and easier to generate. NinjaOne automated endpoint management, on the other hand, provides reliable and customizable reports.